Legal Opinion

San Pedro Lumber Co. v. Reynolds

California Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1898No. L. A. No. 265PublishedCited by 40 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying a new trial. W. H. Clark, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Further facts are stated in the opinion rendered upon appeal from the judgment in 111 Cal. 588.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This is an appeal from the order denying defendants a new trial. The appeal from the judgment in the same ease will be found reported in San Pedro Lumber Co. v. Reynolds, 111 Cal. 588. In the opinion there delivered the nature of the case, and many of the facts necessary to an understanding of this appeal, are presented. Others will be set forth as occasion may demand for a full understanding of the questions.

The plaintiff corporation was engaged in the lumber business. Its legal residence and place of the meetings of its hoard of directors was the city of San Francisco. It owned and'…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Burton v. DriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Marvin v. . BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Rudd v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. McGowan v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Scott v. DepeysterNew York Court of Chancery · 1832

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Munson v. FishburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Coward v. ClantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Faust v. HosfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  4. Family Service Agency of Santa Barbara v. AmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. McShane v. QuillinIdaho Supreme Court · 1929

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API