Drainage Dist. No. 5, Oklahoma County v. Ferrell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Superior Court, Oklahoma County; A. N. Munden, Judge. Proceedings b)'' C. E. Eerrell against Drainage District No. 5, Oklahoma county, before the board of county commissioners. From a judgment of the superior court on appeal from the order of the board of county commissioners, the drainage district brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
BREWER, C.
This action was tried in the superior court of Oklahoma county on appeal from an order of the board of county commissioners of Oklahoma county, and was prosecuted under what is known as the “Drainage Act,” which went into effect March 23, 1909. Chapter 32, Comp. Laws 1909.
The cause was tried, commencing on December IS, 1909, to a jury, and resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of defendant in error in the sum of $650. The cause comes here for review on a transcript of the record, and the plaintiff in error assigns the following errors r First. The court erred in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Stark v. BarrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Haas v. LeesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Vowell v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. HurstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
- Brickner v. SporlederSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Wah-Kon-Tah-He-Um-Pah's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Venator v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- In Re Durkee's WillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- He-to-op-pe v. HannaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Norcom v. MinorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936