Legal Opinion

St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Hurst

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1894PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from Cowley Eistriot Cowrt. ON July 30,1888, Alfred and Elizabeth Hurst commenced their action against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Company, before W. D. Kreamer, a justice of the peace of Arkansas City, in Cowley county, to recover damages on account of the killing of stock by the railway company, claiming $100, the value of the animals, and $100 as attorney’s fees. Summons was issued and served upon the agent of the railway company.

Read the full summary

Error from Cowley Eistriot Cowrt. ON July 30,1888, Alfred and Elizabeth Hurst commenced their action against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Company, before W. D. Kreamer, a justice of the peace of Arkansas City, in Cowley county, to recover damages on account of the killing of stock by the railway company, claiming $100, the value of the animals, and $100 as attorney’s fees. Summons was issued and served upon the agent of the railway company. On the 4th of August, 1888, the day set for trial, the railway company did not appear. Judgment was rendered against the company for $200 — $100…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

HoRTON, C. J.:

In this case a judgment was rendered before the justice of the peace on the 4th of August, 1888. According to the case-made, “ the railway company, on the 9th day of August, 1888, duly filed with said justice of the peace, in his office in Arkansas City, Cowley county, its appeal bond, which was duly approved by said justice of the peace by in-dorsement thereon in writing.” Thereupon, the railway company, the party appealing, within 10 days from the rendition of the judgment, entered into an undertaking to the adverse party.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. St. Louis, Lawrence & Denver Railroad v. WilderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Cox v. WarfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. St. Joseph Mining Co. v. PettittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. ElsingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. RoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API