Legal Opinion

Peerless Motor Co. v. Sterling Finance Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 9, 1934No. Civ. No. 5108PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The defendant Sterling Finance Corporation has appealed from a judgment quieting title in the respondent to one Peerless sedan automobile. It is claimed the respondent is estopped from asserting title thereto. Judgment was also rendered against the other defendants by default. They have not appealed.

The respondent Peerless Motor Company, a corporation, is a factory distributor of Peerless automobiles, authorized to do business in California, with its principal place of business at Los Angeles. The appellant is a financing corporation of the same city. The defendant Arthur Bowe is an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chapman v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. South San Francisco Packing & Provision Co. v. JacobsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Carpenter v. MarkhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Ripley Improvement Co. v. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Towey v. EsserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clevenger v. ClevengerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Corporation of America v. Durham Mutual Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Corporation of America v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. State v. McMahonArizona Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API