Carpenter v. Markham
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. Plaintiff, as contractor, entered into a contract with Carrie B. Shortman, since and now by marriage Carrie B. Markham, to construct for her a dwelling-house. In recompense he was to receive the total sum of $6,440, payable in four separate installments of $1,610 each, the last payment to be due and payable, under the mechanic’s lien law, thirty-five days after the completion of the work. In terms the contract between the parties provided that compensation for additions, changes, and extras shall be agreed upon…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Field v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Newhall v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Chapman v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lemm v. Stillwater Land & Cattle Co.California Supreme Court · 1933
- Coats v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Baker v. FerrelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Coats v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Peal v. Gulf Red Cedar Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.