Legal Opinion

South San Francisco Packing & Provision Co. v. Jacobsen

California Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1920No. S. F. No. 8829PublishedCited by 19 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, Western Meat Company, and against the defendants, Taylor & Rosecrans, in an action in interpleader.

Briefly, the facts of the case are these: Taylor & Rosecrans, at the time the transaction here involved took place, were copartners engaged in the livestock business in the state of Idaho, as also was the defendant Jacobsen, their respective places of business, however, not being in the same locality. Shortly before the tenth day of June, 1915, Jacobsen, by telephone, purchased from Taylor & Rosecrans three carloads of hogs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson—Brinkman Commission Co. v. Central BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. National Bank of Commerce v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Ward v. WatermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Comptoir D'Escompte De Paris v. DresbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Navrides v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Ogier v. Pacific Oil & Gas Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Young v. Harris-Cortner Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Clark v. Hamilton Diamond Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  5. National Bank of New Zealand, Ltd. v. FinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API