Rubalcaba v. Sweeney
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon a defense verdict in a personal injury action.
Appellant was injured when struck by respondent’s automobile on a street in downtown Sacramento. The complaint as amended alleged that at the time of the accident, which occurred at night, appellant was “a pedestrian proceeding in a generally northerly direction across Capitol Avenue.” However, at the trial appellant testified that he was not crossing the street, but was starting to open the door on the driver’s side of his parked automobile. Other than the statements in the verified complaint and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Cucinella v. Weston Biscuit Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Dawson v. LalanneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Kuist v. CurranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hom v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Bristow v. BrinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Novak v. PeiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- DeGeorge v. CrimminsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Sheppard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.