Legal Opinion
DeGeorge v. Crimmins
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 21, 1967No. Civ. 23836PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtElkington, J.
Donald DeGeorge, plaintiff in an action for personal injuries, appeals from a judgment entered following a defense verdict. He urges error in the giving and refusing of certain instructions.
His first assignment of error is stated as: The court committed prejudicial error in refusing to give to the jury plaintiff’s requested instruction on looking and not seeing.
The action involved an automobile collision in which plaintiff’s car was rear-ended by an automobile driven by defendant. Defendant testified that he did not see plaintiff’s car until practically the instant of impact although it was…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Strandt v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Hom v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Laursen v. Tidewater Associated Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Schwenger v. GaitherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Village Development Co. v. FiliceNevada Supreme Court · 1974
- Veronese v. Lucasfilm Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Evans v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Ferreira v. Quik Stop Markets, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Ernest W. Hahn, Inc. v. Sunshield Insulation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.