Legal Opinion

United States v. Hamilton

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 23, 1994No. 93-0654; CMR No. 28588PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*23 Opinion of the Court

WISS, Judge:

Appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer members at Soesterberg Air Base, The Netherlands, in January and February 1990. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of five specifications of writing bad checks totaling in excess of $9300, in violation of Article 123a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 923a. He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for 24 months, and total forfeitures. On May 4, 1990, the convening authority approved the sentence as adjudged. The Court of Military Review affirmed in an…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. United States v. WhiteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  5. United States v. ReynoldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  2. United States v. HumpherysCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  3. United States v. NapoleonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  4. United States v. DaultonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  5. United States v. RomeCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API