Legal Opinion

Dimke v. Farr

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 12, 2011No. A11-329PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WRIGHT, Judge.

In this contract dispute involving the sale of residential real property, appellant-buyers challenge the district court’s summary judgment in favor of respondent-sellers. Appellant-buyers argue that the district court erred by (1) failing to analyze whether respondent-sellers’ notice of declaratory cancellation was effective and (2) failing to exercise its equitable powers to enjoin respondent-sellers’ cancellation of the purchase agreement. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

On April 7, 2010, respondent Jon Muir entered into a purchase agreement (Muir purchase agreement) to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kalenburg v. KleinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API