Dimke v. Farr
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
In this contract dispute involving the sale of residential real property, appellant-buyers challenge the district court’s summary judgment in favor of respondent-sellers. Appellant-buyers argue that the district court erred by (1) failing to analyze whether respondent-sellers’ notice of declaratory cancellation was effective and (2) failing to exercise its equitable powers to enjoin respondent-sellers’ cancellation of the purchase agreement. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
On April 7, 2010, respondent Jon Muir entered into a purchase agreement (Muir purchase agreement) to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kalenburg v. KleinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014