Legal Opinion
People Ex Rel. Freitas v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 11, 1979No. Civ. 43082PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROUSE, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment on the pleadings entered in favor of defendants City and County of San Francisco and its board of supervisors (hereafter City and Board). We are asked to decide whether the provisions of the Cartwright Act apply to the City and whether San Francisco has the authority, under the California Constitution, to set taxicab fares.
The instant action was initiated by the District Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco (hereafter District Attorney), who filed an antitrust complaint for injunction, civil penalties and other equitable relief.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- John M. Dimidowich, Dba Micro Image v. Bell & HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Golden State Transit Corporation v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Cotta v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Palm Springs Medical Clinic, Inc. v. Desert HospitalDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.