Legal Opinion
Golden State Transit Corporation v. City of Los Angeles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 28, 1984No. CA 83-5903PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOLOMON, Judge:
Introduction
Golden State Transit Corporation d/b/a Yellow Cab of Los Angeles (Yellow Cab) brought this action against the City of Los Angeles (City) when the City refused to renew Yellow Gab’s taxicab franchise. Yellow Cab sought a preliminary injunction and moved for partial summary judgment contending that the City committed a per se violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. The district court denied both requests and instead granted the City a partial summary judgment dismissing Yellow Cab’s antitrust claim. 1 The district court based both decisions on its…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Community Communications Co. v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of BakersfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Stucka v. United States of America (In Re Stucka)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1987
- Fitzpatrick v. Schiltz (In Re Schiltz)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1986
- Preferred Communications, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.