Gelder v. Welsh
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Assumpsit by Daniel Gelder against Allie R. Welsh upon a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.
This action was brought to recover upon an alleged promissory note, a copy of which, attached to the plaintiff’s declaration upon the common counts, reads as follows:
“ Chicago, III., July 18, 1903.
“November 9, 1903, after date for value received we promise to pay to order of A. R. Welsh $1,000.00 at Chelsea Savings Bank, Chelsea, Mich., with interest at 6% after date till paid.
[Signed] “Chelsea Meg. Co., Ltd.
“A. R. Welsh, Sec’y.
“ J. D. Watson, Treasr.”
Indorsed: “A. R. Welsh.”
*492Defendant’s plea is the general issue, with a lengthy notice stating that the copy attached to plaintiff’s declaration…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bessenger v. WenzelMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Thomson v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Phillips v. United States Benevolent SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by7 opinions
- Paul v. University Motor Sales Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Whitney v. ChadseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Haynes Automobile Co. v. ShepherdMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Mellen-Wright Lumber Co. v. McNettMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Brown v. Farmer & Ochs Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.