Legal Opinion

Gelder v. Welsh

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1912No. Docket No. 106PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Assumpsit by Daniel Gelder against Allie R. Welsh upon a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

This action was brought to recover upon an alleged promissory note, a copy of which, attached to the plaintiff’s declaration upon the common counts, reads as follows:

“ Chicago, III., July 18, 1903.
“November 9, 1903, after date for value received we promise to pay to order of A. R. Welsh $1,000.00 at Chelsea Savings Bank, Chelsea, Mich., with interest at 6% after date till paid.

[Signed] “Chelsea Meg. Co., Ltd.

“A. R. Welsh, Sec’y.
“ J. D. Watson, Treasr.”

Indorsed: “A. R. Welsh.”

*492Defendant’s plea is the general issue, with a lengthy notice stating that the copy attached to plaintiff’s declaration…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bessenger v. WenzelMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Thomson v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Phillips v. United States Benevolent SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Paul v. University Motor Sales Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Whitney v. ChadseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Haynes Automobile Co. v. ShepherdMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Mellen-Wright Lumber Co. v. McNettMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Brown v. Farmer & Ochs Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API