Legal Opinion

Mellen-Wright Lumber Co. v. McNett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1928No. Docket No. 64PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Defendant William P. Kendall was an indorser on a promissory note of $2,000 due six months after date, with interest at seven per cent, made by Earl P. McNett and Anna J. McNett to the MellenWright Lumber Company, dated December 12, 1925. Suit was commenced against the co-makers and indorser by declaration, to which was attached a letter, under date of June 10, 1926, as follows:

“June 10, 1926.
“Mr. Wm. P. Kendall,
“R. F. D. No. 7, Box 898.
“Royal Oak, Mich.
“D.ear Sir: We hold note for $2,000 with interest at 7 per cent, signed by Earl P. McNett and Anna J. McNett, his wife, on which you indorsed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bessenger v. WenzelMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Whitney v. ChadseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Barger v. FarnhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Parsons v. DickinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Porter v. East Jordan Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Melvin Gelman v. Public National BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  2. Kramer v. StrykerMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. O'Dess v. GunterMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Home Savings Bank v. RefiorMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Jassy v. MarciniakMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API