Legal Opinion

Whitney v. Chadsey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1921No. Docket No. 11PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to Wayne; Goff (John H.), J. Assumpsit by Elson H. Whitney against Charles E. Chadsey on certain promissory notes. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

This is an action to recover from defendant on 12 promissory notes given by the Cedar-edge Orchard Company and indorsed by defendant and other directors of that company. Defendant successfully defended in the trial court on the ground that he had received no notice of the presentment and dishonor of the notes by the company. In 1908 defendant was connected with the public schools of Denver. He and a few friends organized the Cedaredge corporation with an authorized capital of $50,000 to promote a fruit orchard on the western slope of the Rocky Mountains. They purchased a tract of land for *606$20,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. . HortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Baumeister v. KuntzSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  3. Wetherwax v. PaineMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Bessenger v. WenzelMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. In re SwiftDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Case v. McKinnisOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Haynes Automobile Co. v. ShepherdMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Farmers' & Mechanics' Nat. Bank of Fort Worth v. HeadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Mellen-Wright Lumber Co. v. McNettMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Verser v. Sterling Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API