Legal Opinion

Phillips v. United States Benevolent Society

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On rehearing of case reported in 120 Mich. 142 (79 N. W. 1).

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Soon after the former opinion in this case was handed down (see 120 Mich. 142 [79 N. W. 1 ]), a suggestion was made that our holding in point 4 of the opinion was an erroneous statement of the law. A rehearing on that point was ordered, and counsel requested to furnish briefs thereon, as the point was not argued nor any authorities cited in the original briefs. The defendant has furnished no brief, and plaintiff did not furnish one until June 2, 1900. A re-examination of the record shows that this precise point was not raised. The objection was that the testimony was incompetent and imma*187terial…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wood v. CullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
  2. Tayloe v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  3. People v. SeamanMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. People v. LambertMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Phillips v. United States Benevolent SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gelder v. WelshMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Baroda State Bank v. PeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Kelly v. ClementsMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API