Legal Opinion
Bessenger v. Wenzel
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 1, 1910No. Docket No. 100PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Error to .Wayne; Donovan, J. Assumpsit by Frank L. Bessenger against Paul Wenzel and others on a promissory note. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendants on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
On September 11, 1907, suit was instituted in this cause by declaration in assumpsit on all the common counts and with a notice attached that the plaintiff would offer in evidence a certain promissory note, in words and figures as follows:
“$2,000.00. Detroit, Mich., April 10, 1907.
“Ninety days after date we promise to pay to Frank L. Bessenger, or order, two thousand dollars, at German American Bank.
“Value received, with 6 per cent, interest per annum.
[Signed] ■ “Marvel Motor Car Co.,
“By W. J. Looman,
“ Secy. & Treas.”
*62Written across the end of the note and on the face thereof: “Engelbert…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wetherwax v. PaineMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
- First National Bank v. CurrieMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- In re SwiftDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1901
- Parsons v. DickinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Armstrong v. ChadwickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Attorney General Ex Rel. O'Hara v. MontgomeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Whitney v. ChadseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Valentine v. MaloneMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Murphy v. National City BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Gelder v. WelshMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.