Legal Opinion

Lumen v. Paley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1941No. Appeal, 36PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Patterson,,

This appeal is from an order striking, off a writ of scire facias to join an. additional defendant claimed to be “liable over” to the original defendant in a trespass action for personal injuries.

Ralph Lumen, plaintiff, brought suit against the original defendant, Phil Paley, to recover for . personal injuries alleged to have been sustained.by him, on July 15, 1936, while he was engaged, as an employee of the Dithridge Development Company, in painting the Dithridge Apartments, located at 144 Dithridge Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, as a result of being…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rau v. MankoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Murray v. FrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Murray v. Pittsburgh Athletic Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Wolk v. Pittsburgh Hotels Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Bowers v. GladsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Newman v. FreemanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Shaull v. AS Beck New York Shoe Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Zachrel v. Universal Oil Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Battle v. Laurel Line Taxicab Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1945
  5. Carey v. Petrilak, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API