Legal Opinion

Mateo v. M/S KISO

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 9, 1992No. C-90-2357 DLJPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JENSEN, District Judge.

There are three motions before the Court. First, several defendants have filed a motion to quash service of process. Second, other defendants have filed a motion for summary adjudication of the issue of whether certain elements of plaintiffs’ benefit package constitute “wages” under 46 U.S.C. § 10313. Third, plaintiffs have filed a motion to certify an interlocutory appeal. A hearing was held on the first two motions on January 15, 1992, and the third motion was heard on January 29, 1992. At both hearings, plaintiffs were represented by Marvin Stender and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ronald B. Brockmeyer Eromedia, Ltd. v. David C. May v. Marquis Publications, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Graval v. P.T. Bakrie & Bros.District Court, C.D. California · 1996
  3. Stanwood v. Mary Kay, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
  4. Schiffer v. Mazda Motor Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2000
  5. Cortez v. MTD Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API