Legal Opinion

Schiffer v. Mazda Motor Corp.

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided April 6, 2000No. Civ.A. No. 1:00CV235TWTPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

THRASH, District Judge.

This is a products liability action. It is before the Court on the Defendant Mazda Motor Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 3-1] and Motion for a Preliminary Hearing [Doc. 3-2], For the reasons set forth below, both motions are denied.

I. BACKGROUND

This case arises out of an automobile collision that occurred on December 31, 1997. Plaintiff was driving a 1992 Mazda automobile northbound on Interstate 75-85 in Atlanta, Georgia. She was wearing the vehicle’s motorized passive restraint shoulder belt. Plaintiffs vehicle was struck on the driver’s side by a passing…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Maximov v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Chrysler Corp. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1984
  4. Bankston v. Toyota Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  5. Gallagher v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bakala v. BakalaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. ColemonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. HernandezDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
  4. Denlinger v. CHINADOTCOM CORP.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. Unlimited PCS Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API