Legal Opinion
Stanwood v. Mary Kay, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided September 20, 2012No. Case No. SACV 12-00312-CJC(ANx)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE
CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
On February 28, 2012, Plaintiff Ashley Stanwood, along with other individuals (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), brought a nationwide putative class action against three cosmetic companies, Mary Kay, Inc. (“Mary Kay”), The Estee Lauder Companies, Inc. and Estee Lauder, Inc. (together, “Estee Lauder”), and Avon Products, Inc. (“Avon”) (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiffs allege that Defendants defrauded American consumers by marketing and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- John Doe v. United States of America, in Re John Doe, Debtor. John Doe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re Vizio, Inc., Consumer Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
- Hodsdon v. Mars, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Opperman v. Path, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- McCoy v. Nestle USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Sud v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.