Legal Opinion
Graval v. P.T. Bakrie & Bros.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided April 12, 1996No. CV-95-4336 KMW (SHx)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CONSUELO BLAND MARSHALL, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Binks A. Graval (“Graval”) has brought this action for breach of contract against four foreign corporations, P.T. Bakrie & Brothers (“B & B”), P.T. Bakrie Nusan-tara Corporation (“Nusantara”), P.T. Bakrie Investindo (“Investindo”), and Timeswitch Investment Ltd. (“Timeswitch”). Graval alleges that he entered into a contract with some or all of the above-named defendants for the purpose of developing business opportunities for the defendants in the People’s Republic of China. Graval further alleges that after expending time…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Jackson v. HayakawaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Mitchell B. Haisten, Individually and as the Administrator of the Estate of Jean E. Haisten v. Grass Valley Medical Reimbursement Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Resource Ventures, Inc. v. Resources Management International, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
- Brown v. China Integrated Energy, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Forum Financial Group, LLC v. President & Fellows of Harvard CollegeDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2001
- Proctor & Gamble Cellulose Co. v. Viskoza-LoznicaDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.