Legal Opinion

Veum v. Sheeran

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 30, 1905No. Nos. 14,305—(111)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

After the decision reported in 88- Minn. 257, defendant demanded a second trial under the statute. After such trial before Cadwell, J.r Soneva Houg and Gertrude Veum, widow and daughter respectively of Peter O. Houg and his sole heirs, were made parties defendant.

Read the full summary

After the decision reported in 88- Minn. 257, defendant demanded a second trial under the statute. After such trial before Cadwell, J.r Soneva Houg and Gertrude Veum, widow and daughter respectively of Peter O. Houg and his sole heirs, were made parties defendant. The action having been transferred to the district court for Te Sueur county, judgment therein was entered that defendant Sheeran was entitled to a conveyance of the land described in the pleadings, upon payment of the sum of $3,955.30 within thirty days thereafter to the plaintiff and the defendant widow and daughter, or in case…

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Action in ejectment by the administrator of the estate of Peter O. Ploug, in which defendant pleaded in defense that during the lifetime of Houg, who owned the land in controversy, defendant entered into a contract with him for the purchase of the same, of which he demanded specific performance. The nature of the answer changed the form of the action into one in effect to.determine the validity of the alleged contract,, and whether it should be specifically performed. The trial court found that a verbal contract for the sale of the land was entered into between Houg and defendant, and that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brown v. HoagSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  2. Chadwick v. CornishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  3. Tingue v. PatchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  4. Bartz v. PaffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Jorgenson v. JorgensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Shaughnessy v. EidsmoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Hahne v. BurrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State Bank v. StrandbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  4. Trebesch v. TrebeschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. Finn v. Modern Brotherhood of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API