Legal Opinion

Jorgenson v. Jorgenson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 26, 1900No. Nos. 12,344—(152)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Action in the district court for Watonwan county for specific performance of a contract for sale of land. The case was tried before Cadwell, J., who found that plaintiff was entitled to the relief demanded as against all defendants except Tilda Jorgenson. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendants except Tilda Jorgenson appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This action is one to compel the specific performance of a verbal contract for the sale of land. Judgment was ordered for plaintiff in *429tbe court below, after trial before tbe court without a jury, and defendants appeal from an order denying a new trial.

Several errors are assigned in this court, but they all go to tbe question whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain the findings. A number of exceptions were taken to rulings made during the trial, but they are not assigned as errors. So we have only to determine whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain the findings.

The court below…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Svanburg v. FosseenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  2. Brown v. HoagSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. Williams v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  4. Slingerland v. SlingerlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  5. Cabbott v. RadfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Shaughnessy v. EidsmoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Veum v. SheeranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Trebesch v. TrebeschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Jorgenson v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  5. Ferguson v. TrovatenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API