Legal Opinion

Tingue v. Patch

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 16, 1904No. Nos. 14,054—(59)PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Action of ejectment in the district court for Steele county. The case was tried before Buckham, J., who found in favor of plaintiff. From a judgment entered pursuant to the findings, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Action in ejectment in which plaintiff had judgment, and defendant appealed.

The facts are as follows: Defendant became the owner of the land in controversy in this action in February, 1888, at which time it was incumbered by a mortgage of $400 to one Cordelia M. Stewart, which defendant assumed and agreed to pay as a part of the purchase price of the land. He failed to pay the debt, and the mortgage was foreclosed in 1891. The sale under foreclosure took place on April 18 of that year, and the land was bid in by the mortgagee, Mrs. Stewart, for the sum of $548, the amount due, with costs and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Liljengren Furniture & Lumber Co. v. MeadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Williams v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  3. O'Connor v. HughesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  4. Joslyn v. SchwendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  5. Mo v. BettnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Oertel v. PierceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  2. Mathwig v. StrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Lawton v. JoestingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. Rahm v. CummingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. Veum v. SheeranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API