Legal Opinion

Coray v. Southern Pac. Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1947No. 6967PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONOUGH, Chief Justice.

The trial court directed a verdict against the plaintiff administrator in an action against the railroad for alleged wrongful death, and plaintiff appeals. There is no serious dispute as to the facts. Plaintiff contends that the death resulted from negligence in alleged violation of the Safety Appliance Act, 45 U. S. C. A. § 1 et seq., while respondent contends that the decedent was furnished with a safe appliance and mechanism, and that the death of decedent was proximately caused solely by his own heedless conduct in running into the caboose of a freight train which…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Coray v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Emmett E. Page v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  3. Devine v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State v. CastilloUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Kennedy v. New Era Industries, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API