Legal Opinion
United States v. Parkhurst
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided November 22, 1924No. 2380PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
Hair of the cashmere goat imported into the United States was classified by the collector of customs at the port of New York as hair like to that of the Angora goat and assessed for duty under paragraph 308 of the act of 1913.
The importers protested that the merchandise was free of duty as wool under paragraph 650, but all of the protests were presented to the collector more than 30 days after the liquidations were made. The Secretary of the Treasury, however, ordered a reliquidation of the entries; and the importers, within 30 days after that reliquidation, again protested that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Robertson v. DowningSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- United States v. WhitridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Saji & Kariya Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- United States v. Lucius Beebe & SonsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903
- United States v. Godchaux Sugars, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Barr v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
- Washington International Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Lorraine Fibre Mills, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Slazengers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- SSK Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.