Legal Opinion

Barr v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 30, 1943No. C. D. 801PublishedCited by 328 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ekwall, Judge:

The question involved in this case is the proper rate at which the currency of the invoice of certain imported goods should be converted into United States dollars under, the provisions of section 522 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The merchandise consists of wool cloth manufactured in Scotland and exported to this country on May 3, 1940, under an invoice made out in pounds sterling. For the purpose of assessment of the ad valorem duty upon this wool cloth it was necessary for the collector of customs at the port of entry to convert the pounds sterling to United States currency.

*89O…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. WhitridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Hadden v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. United States v. ParkhurstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  4. United States v. Lucius Beebe & SonsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903
  5. Fry v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3Cited by328 opinions

  1. Mamary Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  2. Otto Gerdau Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  3. Barr v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
  4. A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  5. A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948

323 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API