United States v. Godchaux Sugars, Inc.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge
The merchandise in this case is called a carbon or norit retort and is claimed to be entitled to free entry as machinery for use in the manufacture of sugar under paragraph 391 of the tariff act of 1913. It was classified by the collector in the first instance and held dutiable under paragraph 167 of the same act as a manufacture of metal not specially provided for. It will be later hereinafter more specifically described.
The following is a chronological statement of the proceedings touching the entry and liquidations:
April 8, 1920, the merchandise was entered at the port of New Orleans as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Robertson v. DowningSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- United States v. Sherman & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. American Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- United States v. Brown, Durrell & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903
- United States v. DicksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. ParkhurstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Bertrose Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
- United States v. FenstererCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Ataka America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
- Miles v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.