Lorraine Fibre Mills, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Johnson, Judge:
The protest in this suit is directed against the legality of a reliquidation of warehouse entry No. 39469, dated June 12, 1947. It is claimed that the reliquidation is null and void on the following grounds: (1) That the entry did not appear in the daily bulletin of liquidation postings for December 21, 1953; (2) that the reliquidation contravenes section 515 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which, it is claimed, makes no provision for a reliquidation that increases the rate or amount of duty; and (3) that the reliquidation occurred more than 60 days after the original liquidation.
Cou…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. ParkhurstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Dublin v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
- Klumpp v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1908
- Hutchinson v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
- M. S. & J. A. Workman, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- State Metals, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
- Olavarria & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- British West Indies Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Close v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961