Legal Opinion

Slazengers, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 8, 1957No. C. D. 1919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

The facts in this case are not in dispute. The plaintiff, in a previous case, filed in this court protests 210744-K and 211373-K, Slazengers, Inc. v. United States, 33 Cust. Ct. 338, Abstract 58323. The protest first above mentioned covered entries 838134, 848957, 826065, 826066, and 829351. Other and separate entries are covered by the remaining protest. These cases were consolidated for trial and decided in favor of the importer, the court holding that the merchandise there in question should have been classified for duty under paragraph 1502 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. RobinsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  2. United States v. ParkhurstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  3. Slazengers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  4. Gabriel v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Texas Mex Brick & Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
  2. United States Customs Service v. Apex Oil Co. (In Re Apex Oil Co.)District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1991
  3. Shigoto International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. Bultz v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API