Legal Opinion

Helm v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1999No. 97-326PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The dispositive issue in this case is whether Linda K. Helm (Helm) failed to meet the burden of proof assigned to her under Pederson v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers’ Compensation Din, 939 P.2d 740, 742 (Wyo.1997). Specifically, the hearing examiner decided that Helm failed to demonstrate that carpal tunnel syndrome, claimed as a subsequent injury, was causally related to an original, covered injury to her knee. The failure of proof is subject to the rule on review testing whether the decision was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or contrary to law. Helm phrases…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wyoming Steel & Fab, Inc. v. RoblesWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Wyoming Bancorporation v. BonhamWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  3. City of Casper v. UtechWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Martinez v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Pederson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Worker's Compensation Claim of Newman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hurley v. PDQ Transport, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hicks v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Frazier v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. Lysne (In re Lysne)Wyoming Supreme Court · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API