City of Casper v. Utech
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The controversy in this appeal centers upon the articulation of findings of fact by an administrative agency when the party holding the burden of proof fails to sustain that burden. In a post-termination hearing, the Personnel Review Panel (Board) ruled the City of Casper (Casper) had faded to establish the asserted grounds for discharge of its employee, Michael Utech (Utech) by admissible, relevant, and credible evidence. Its finding as to each ground was that there was insufficient evidence. Casper sought review in the district court where the Board’s decision was affirmed.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
- Wyoming Steel & Fab, Inc. v. RoblesWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Wind River Indian Education Ass'n v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mountain Fuel Supply Co. v. Public Service Commission of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Wyoming Bancorporation v. BonhamWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Newman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Pederson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Pino v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Wyoming Department of Revenue v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Brees v. Gulley Enterprises, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.