Legal Opinion

Pederson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1997No. 96-111PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The primary challenge by Della M. Peder-son (Pederson) to the denial of worker’s compensation benefits by the hearing examiner is that the decision did not comport with the evidence. The hearing examiner found that the evidence did not demonstrate a job-related injury resulting from an accident at the job site and the “injury” for which Pederson sought benefits was not caused by her employment. Instead, the hearing examiner ruled that “the difficulties she encountered before and after September 15, 1994 [the date of the claimed injury] were the result of a pre-existing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Corman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Wyoming Steel & Fab, Inc. v. RoblesWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Wyoming Bancorporation v. BonhamWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  4. City of Casper v. UtechWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Martinez v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Worker's Compensation Claim of Newman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Pino v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Bando v. Clure Bros. FurnitureWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Worker's Compensation Claim Of: Ikenberry v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Worker's Compensation Claim of Keck v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1999

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API