Hicks v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Irene Hicks (Hicks) appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Medical Commission (the Medical Commission) denying her request for worker’s compensation benefits for a September 2001 spinal fusion surgery that, she claimed, was the product of a work-related injury she suffered in July 1998. The Medical Commission concluded that Hicks was not a credible witness, and that she had failed in her burden of proving causation, as substantial evidence showed that Hicks’ work-related injury had resolved before her surgery. We affirm.
ISSUES
[¶ 2] Hicks presents three…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Newman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Corman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Tenorio v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Romero v. Davy McKee Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Lindbloom v. Teton InternationalWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Bush v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Decker v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Medical CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Spletzer v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Rodgers v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Licensure of Penny v. State ex rel. Wyoming Mental Health Professions Licensing BoardWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.