Legal Opinion

Frazier v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2000No. 99-174PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

After a contested case hearing to determine Appellant Daniel Frazier’s eligibility for worker’s compensation benefits, the hearing examiner held that Appellant failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that his working conditions materially aggravated his preexisting medical condition. The district court affirmed the hearing examiner’s denial of Appellant’s request for medical benefits.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Appellant presents the following issues for review:

1. Whether there was any factual basis for the decision of the Hearing Examiner in this case in denying Appellant’s…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wyoming Steel & Fab, Inc. v. RoblesWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Wyoming Bancorporation v. BonhamWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  3. City of Casper v. UtechWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Martinez v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Pederson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Worker's Compensation Claim of Anastos v. General Chemical Soda AshWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In the Matter of the Worker's Compensation Claim of: Kirk Jacobs v. State of Wyoming, ex rel., Wyoming Workers' Safety and Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Salas v. General ChemicalWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Hicks v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Worker's Compensation Claim of Stevens v. State Ex Rel. Department of Workforce Services, Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API