Legal Opinion

Maiuri v. Sinacola Construction Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1969No. Calendar 17, Docket 52,104PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Per curiam

On July 30, 1964, Albert D. Maiuri, the 24-year-old unmarried son of plaintiffs, while working for defendant, Sinacola Construction Company, in a 27-foot deep trench, died from injuries sustained when a chunk of earth fell and crushed his skull. At the time of death, Sinacola was subject to the provisions of the Michigan workmen’s compen sation act. Plaintiffs, liis parents, did not qualify as dependents within the meaning of that act.

Plaintiffs made application for hearing and adjustment of claim with the workmen’s compensation department. They received a $500 statutory burial allowance.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Burns v. Van LaanMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Dolson v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Jordan v. CA Roberts CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Sweetland v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Roberts v. City of TroyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  2. Wesche v. Mecosta County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Nanasi v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Endykiewicz v. State Highway CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Simkins v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API