Legal Opinion

Simkins v. General Motors Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1996No. 102150, Calendar No. 15PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AFTER REMAND

Riley, J.

In this appeal, this Court is asked to clarify when an employer has an obligation to pay worker’s compensation to an employee who is injured while traveling to work under the “going and coming” provision, MCL 418.301(3); MSA 17.237(301)(3), of the Worker’s Disability Compensation Act. We hold that under subsection 301(3) of the act, an employee does not suffer an injury that occurred in the course of his employment while traveling to work, when he was injured on a public street, not maintained by the employer, as he was walking from a private parking lot to the worksite.…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Bradford Electric Light Co. v. ClapperSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. McAvoy v. H B Sherman Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Husted v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Mathis v. Interstate Motor Freight SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Hills v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Brown v. Cassens Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. Harris v. VernierMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Sweatt v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Haske v. Transport Leasing, Inc., IndianaMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Calovecchi v. MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API