Legal Opinion

Sweetland v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1898PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error t'o Cass; Coolidge, J. Case by John B. Sweetland, administrator of the estate of Evaline A. Aldrich, deceased, against the Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Company, for negligently causing the death of plaintiff’s intestate. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, C. J.

We do not think that there was any tan*331gible evidence from which the jury had the right to infer that the deceased endured pain and suffering. The two trains collided with terrific force, and many were instantly killed. The witness Allen testified that he reached the telescoped car within three or four minutes after the collision; that he heard wails and groans within; that the car took fire within a minute or two afterwards; that within 10 or 15 minutes they were driven away by the heat of the flames. Plaintiff was a physician, and brother of the deceased. He testified that both the upper and…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Steamboat Co. v. ChaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Holton v. DalyIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. The CorsairSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. McCullough v. New York & N. Steamboat Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1893
  5. Hurst v. Detroit City RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. Regional Medical Laboratories, PCMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. CassinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Love v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Ford v. Maney's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Baker v. SlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API