Wolf v. Gold
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtMcNally, J.
Defendants appeal from an order denying their motion pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the amended complaint.
Upon this appeal defendants must be deemed to admit the truth of every material allegation of fact contained in the complaint and of any inference that may be legitimately drawn therefrom. (Lamb v. Cheney & Son, 227 N. Y. 418, 420; Nevins, Inc. v. Kasmach, 279 N. Y. 323, 325; Kane v. Walsh, 295 N. Y. 198, 203.) The individual plaintiff Dr. Wolf is the sole stockholder in the plaintiff Lefferts General Hospital, Inc. At one time defendant Dr. Gold was an…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Advance Music Corp. v. American Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Lamb v. S. Cheney & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Nann v. RaimistNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Marlin Fire Arms Co. v. . ShieldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fashion Two Twenty, Inc. v. SteinbergDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1971
- Sid Dillon Chevrolet-Oldsmobile-Pontiac, Inc. v. SullivanNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Aoki v. Benihana Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Zimmerman v. DCA at Welleby, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Mazzocone v. WillingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.