Legal Opinion
Fashion Two Twenty, Inc. v. Steinberg
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 29, 1971No. 71 C 665PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
MISHLER, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff moves for a preliminary injunction. The defendants Marjo, Inc., Marvin E. Roseberry, Jo Roseberry, Finelle Industries, Maurice Feigenbaum, Dorothy L. Feigenbaum and Hal Hoham move to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure claiming lack of subject matter jurisdiction and lack of original jurisdiction (as to all claims as they relate to the above-named individual defendants and as to the second and third claims as they relate to the corporate defendants.) Defendants also claim improper…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Sunward Electronics, Inc. v. Keith L. McDonald Robert D. McDonald and Dog Guard Out-Of Site Fencing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Columbia Briargate Company, a Limited Partnership v. First National Bank in Dallas Vaughn Pearson and A.S. Kyzer, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- A. L. Black v. Acme Markets, Inc., First National Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Bulova Watch Co., Inc. v. K. Hattori & Co., Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- Merkel Associates, Inc. v. Bellofram Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1977
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.