Sid Dillon Chevrolet-Oldsmobile-Pontiac, Inc. v. Sullivan

The district court found appellant Morton Sullivan and his businesses to be in contempt of court in regard to Sullivan’s *723repeated violations of a temporary restraining order prohibiting him from uttering any word concerning appellees Sid Dillon and his businesses. Although Sullivan’s and Dillon’s businesses are named as parties to this action, we will refer to the appellants as Sullivan and the appellees as Dillon, since the focus of this opinion is on these individuals. Further, the district court substituted a permanent injunction for its temporary restraining order in regard to Sullivan’s…