Legal Opinion
Nann v. Raimist
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 6, 1931PublishedCited by 116 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cardozo, Ch. J.
The controversy is one between rival labor unions competing for supremacy.
The trade represented by the two unions is that of bakers and confectioners. The plaintiff association is a local union of the Amalgamated Food Workers; the defendant association, which is affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, is a. local union of the Bakery and Confectionery Workers’ International Union of America. Each union is accustomed to make contracts with employers in the trade whereby the employers so contracting agree to employ the members of the chosen union to the exclusion of all…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Exchange Bakery & Restaurant, Inc. v. RifkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- American Bank & Trust Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Marlin Fire Arms Co. v. . ShieldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by116 opinions
- Milk Wagon Drivers Union, Local 753 v. Meadowmoor Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Downey v. United Weatherproofing, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Goldfinger v. FeintuchNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- May's Furs & Ready-To-Wear, Inc. v. BauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.