Legal Opinion
Gormbard v. Zurich Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided September 12, 2006No. SC 17443PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
This appeal requires us to determine whether an insurance carrier that issues a reduced premium, specialty automobile liability insurance policy on an antique automobile that is used only for activities *810such as exhibitions and parades lawfully may limit uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage under that specialty policy to accidents involving the occupancy or use of the antique automobile. The plaintiff, Cheryl Gormbard, and her husband, William Gormbard, purchased such a policy from the defendant, Zurich Insurance Company (Zurich), insuring their 1929 Ford Model A…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Haynes v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Elledge v. WarrenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. SalamonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Tannone v. Amica Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- McDonough v. ForrestConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Ludemann v. Specialty National InsuranceConnecticut Superior Court · 2008
- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 4, Local 1303-385 v. Westport Dept. of Public WorksConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.