Legal Opinion

McDonough v. Forrest

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 5, 2011No. AC 32047PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALVORD, J.

The plaintiff, John McDonough, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant United Services Automobile Association. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that he was not entitled to coverage under the uninsured/underinsured motorist section of his insurance policy issued by the defendant. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our disposition of this appeal. The plaintiff commenced this action on October 15, 2008, alleging in his complaint…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Harvey v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. Craig v. Stafford Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. Travelers Insurance v. KullaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mangiafico v. State Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  2. Selene Finance, L.P. v. TornatoreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API