Wyant v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KOELTL, District Judge:
The plaintiffs Susan and Edward Wyant have moved to amend their complaint, pursu ant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 15 and 20, to add an additional defendant, Nelson Maintenance Services, Inc. (“Nelson Maintenance”). Because the joinder of Nelson Maintenance would destroy diversity jurisdiction, the plaintiffs also have moved to remand the ease to state court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(e). The defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) has opposed the motions and has requested, in the alternative, permission to amend its notice…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hensgens v. Deere & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Casas Office MacHines, Inc. v. Mita Copystar America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Ryan v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1992
- Righetti v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Briarpatch Ltd., LP v. PateDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Paul S. Burka, and Robert A. Burka, Trustees v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Massaro v. Bard Access Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- Hahn v. RauchDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- Briarpatch Ltd., LP v. Geisler Roberdeau, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.