Legal Opinion
Briarpatch Ltd., LP v. Pate
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 20, 2000No. 99 Civ. 8968(RWS)PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Briarpatch Limited L.P. (“Briarpatch” or the “Partnership”) and Gerard F. Rubin (“Rubin”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) have moved, pursuant to Rule 19, Fed.R.Civ.P., and 28 U.S.C. 1447(e), to amend their complaint, add necessary parties, and remand the action to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County. Defendant Stephen V. Pate (“Pate”) has moved, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2), to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ motion will be granted. Because the action will…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- T. B. Harms Company v. Edward Eliscu and Ross Jungnickel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- John PAMPILLONIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RJR NABISCO, INC., Nabisco Foods Group, Planters Lifesavers Company, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Alexander & Alexander of New York, Inc. v. FritzenNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Brackett v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Scott v. Prudential Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Ghaly v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Reich v. LopezDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Amusement Industry, Inc. v. SternDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Mosdos Chofetz Chaim, Inc. v. Village of Wesley HillsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Blakeley v. United Cable SystemDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2000
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.