Legal Opinion
Briarpatch Ltd., LP v. Geisler Roberdeau, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 28, 2001No. 99 Civ. 9623(RWS)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Briarpatch Limited, L.P. (“Briarpatch”) and Gerard F. Rubin (“Rubin”) (collectively “plaintiffs”) have moved to amend the complaint (1) to add two claims against defendant Terrence Malick (“Malick”); (2) to add the law firm of Frankfurt Garbus Klein & Selz (“Frankfurt Garbus”) as an additional proper, necessary or indispensable party; and (3) to conform to evidence obtained during discovery, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a), 19 and 20. In addition, plaintiffs move to extend the discovery cut-off by six months. Defendants Phoenix Pictures, Inc.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- New York University v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Block v. First Blood AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Zahra v. Town Of SoutholdCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Leo Vine v. Beneficial Finance Company, Inc., and Charles H. Dowd, Stuart A. Wixson, George J. Springer, C. H. Donohue and Crown Finance Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Moses v. MartinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Stadt v. Fox News Network LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Command Cinema Corp. v. VCA Labs, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Cook v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Opportunity Fund, LLC v. Epitome Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.