Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Blackwell v. Crawford

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 2005No. 2005-1248PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is an original action for a writ of prohibition to prevent a trial court from proceeding in a case seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the Secretary of State.

{¶ 2} In 2002, following the problems that arose from the 2000 presidential election, Congress passed the Help America Vote Act (“HAVA”), Sections 15301 et seq., Title 42, U.S.Code. See, e.g., Sequoia Voting Sys., Inc. v. Ohio Secy. of State, 125 Ohio Misc.2d 7, 2003-Ohio-4799, 796 N.E.2d 598, ¶ 8. The title of HAVA specifies that one of its purposes is “to provide funds to States to replace punch card voting…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Rootstown Local School District Board of Education v. Portage County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Racing Guild of Ohio, Local 304 v. Ohio State Racing CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Friedman v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State ex rel. United States Steel Corp. v. ZaleskiOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Manning v. Ohio State Library BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dzina v. CelebrezzeOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Smith v. BradshawOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State ex rel. CNG Financial Corp. v. NadelOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Meccon, Inc. v. University of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Ohio Academy of Nursing Homes v. Ohio Department of Job & Family ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API