Legal Opinion

Manning v. Ohio State Library Board

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1991No. 90-1567PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The first issue before this court is whether state courts have concurrent subject matter jurisdiction with federal courts for Title VII actions. The second issue presented is which court(s) have jurisdiction to hear such cases filed against the state of Ohio. For the reasons which follow, we find that state courts have concurrent jurisdiction with federal courts over Title VII claims and that such claims, if filed against the state of Ohio, must be filed in the Court of Claims.

Appellant’s first cause of action involves an interpretation of subject matter jurisdiction under Title VII of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Tafflin v. LevittSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. DonnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Brown v. Western R. Co. of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Palmer v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Cheap Escape Co. v. Haddox, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Proctor v. KardassilarisOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Burns v. DailyOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State Ex Rel. Richard v. Cuyahoga County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Bungard v. Dept. of Job Family Servs., 07ap-447 (11-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API